Knudsen Number Sensitivity to Pressure Drop in Composite Ceramic Membranes

Authors

  • Muktar M. Ramalan School of Computing, Engineering and Technology, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
  • Idris Hashim School of Computing, Engineering and Technology, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
  • Muhammad Dauda Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria
  • Igbagara Tonye School of Computing, Engineering and Technology, Robert Gordon University Aberdeen, United Kingdom

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jamst.v30n1.335

Keywords:

Knudsen number; ceramic nanomaterials; mean free path; hydrogen separation; contact angle

Abstract

Gas transport in nanoscale ceramic membranes is fundamentally governed by the Knudsen number (Kn), which differentiates between molecular dominated and continuum dominated flow regimes. This study experimentally evaluates the sensitivity of Kn to transmembrane pressure across multilayer alumina membranes comprising a 15 nm selective layer, a 200 nm intermediate layer, and a 6000 nm macroporous support. Hydrogen (H₂), carbon dioxide (CO₂), and air were investigated at 100 °C over a pressure range of 20–300 kPa. The results consistently show an inverse relationship between Kn and pressure for all gases and pore sizes, as predicted by kinetic gas theory due to the pressure dependent decrease in molecular mean free path. Among the gases studied, hydrogen exhibits the strongest pressure sensitivity in the 15 nm layer, followed by CO₂ and air, reflecting differences in molecular size and diffusivity. Linear regression applied to the experimental Kn–ΔP trends yields coefficients of determination of R² ≈ 0.8875 across all gases and pore diameters, confirming high linearity and strong internal consistency in the measurements. Although the R² values remain constant, each gas exhibits a distinct regression slope and intercept, as shown in Figures 4–6, indicating differing Kn pressure response characteristics. Complementary SEM and dynamic wettability measurements further support the mechanistic interpretation. The 15 nm top layer shows the highest hydrophilicity (equilibrium contact angle ≈ 60°), promoting enhanced gas–wall interactions. The 200 nm layer exhibits intermediate wettability (≈ 70°), while the 6000 nm support is weakly hydrophobic (≈ 93°). These structural and surface properties help explain the observed trends: smaller and more hydrophilic pores intensify molecule–wall collisions, amplifying Knudsen-dominated transport. Overall, the findings provide validated experimental benchmarks for modelling rarefied gas transport in composite ceramic membranes, with implications for hydrogen purification, CO₂ separation, and catalytic membrane reactor design.

References

Bera, A., Kumar, S., Foroozesh, J., & Gharavi, A. (2022). Multiphysics gas transport in nanoporous unconventional reservoirs: Challenges of mathematical modelling. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 103, 104649.

Schlaich, A., Barrat, J. L., & Coasne, B. (2025). Theory and modeling of transport for simple fluids in nanoporous materials: From microscopic to coarse-grained descriptions. Chemical Reviews, 125(5), 2561–2624.

Ogunlude, P. (2023). Gas diffusion transport characteristics and mathematical description of membrane systems with application for biogas upgrading (Doctoral dissertation, Robert Gordon University).

Liu, Y., Li, N., Cui, X., Yan, W., Su, J., & Jin, L. (2022). A review on the morphology and material properties of the gas separation membrane: Molecular simulation. Membranes, 12(12), 1274.

Armatas, G. S. (2006). Determination of the effects of the pore size distribution and pore connectivity distribution on the pore tortuosity and diffusive transport in model porous networks. Chemical Engineering Science, 61(14), 4662–4675.

Kawashima, K., Shirzadi, M., Fukasawa, T., Fukui, K., Tsuru, T., & Ishigami, T. (2022). Numerical modeling for particulate flow through realistic microporous structure of microfiltration membrane: Direct numerical simulation coordinated with focused ion beam scanning electron microscopy. Powder Technology, 410, 117872.

Maier, L., Scherle, M., Hopp-Hirschler, M., & Nieken, U. (2021). Effective transport parameters of porous media from 2D microstructure images. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 175, 121371.

Vaartstra, G., Lu, Z., Grossman, J. C., & Wang, E. N. (2021). Numerical validation of the dusty-gas model for binary diffusion in low aspect ratio capillaries. Physics of Fluids, 33(12).

Reinecke, S. A., & Sleep, B. E. (2002). Knudsen diffusion, gas permeability, and water content in an unconsolidated porous medium. Water Resources Research, 38(12), 16-1.

Ishizaki, K., Komarneni, S., & Nanko, M. (2013). Porous materials: Process technology and applications (Vol. 4). Springer Science & Business Media.

Mourkou, M., Yu, H., Baltussen, S., Snead, N., Kapil, N., & Coppens, M. O. (2024). A novel ultra-high vacuum diffusion setup to study Knudsen diffusion. Reaction Chemistry & Engineering, 9(11), 3047–3059.

Kotobuki, M., Gu, Q., Zhang, L., & Wang, J. (2021). Ceramic–polymer composite membranes for water and wastewater treatment: Bridging the big gap between ceramics and polymers. Molecules, 26(11), 3331.

Han, B., & Gabriel, J. C. P. (2024). Thin-film nanocomposite (TFN) membrane technologies for the removal of emerging contaminants from wastewater. Journal of Cleaner Production, 480, 144043.

Xu, D., Luo, X., Jin, P., Zhu, J., Zhang, X., Zheng, J., Yang, L., Zhu, X., Liang, H., & Van der Bruggen, B. (2022). A novel ceramic-based thin-film composite nanofiltration membrane with enhanced performance and regeneration potential. Water Research, 215, 118264.

Hu, J., Zhang, Y., & Dong, M. (2024). Recent advances in layered double hydroxides membranes: Insights into multiple mass transport. Advanced Functional Materials, 34(14), 2312452.

Chaudhari, S., Chakravarty, S., Cho, Y., Seo, J., Shon, M., & Nam, S. (2025). Advancements in organic solvent nanofiltration: The critical role of polyamide membranes in sustainable industrial applications. Processes, 13(7), 2212.

Zhou, X., Shevate, R., Huang, D., Cao, T., Shen, X., Hu, S., Mane, A. U., Elam, J. W., Kim, J. H., & Elimelech, M. (2023). Ceramic thin-film composite membranes with tunable subnanometer pores for molecular sieving. Nature Communications, 14(1), 7255.

Karim, S. S., Ahsan, M., Farrukh, S., Fan, X., & Yu, Z. (2025). Multi-layer Composite (MLC) membranes gas transport models and separation mechanisms. In Multi-Layer Composite (MLC) Membranes for Gas Separation: Volume 1: A Fundamental Overview (pp. 159–185). Springer Nature Switzerland.

Oyama, S. T., Yamada, M., Sugawara, T., Takagaki, A., & Kikuchi, R. (2011). Review on mechanisms of gas permeation through inorganic membranes. Journal of the Japan Petroleum Institute, 54(5), 298–309.

Guan, Z. L., Wang, Y. D., Wang, Z., Hong, Y., Liu, S. L., Luo, H. W., Liu, X. L., & Su, B. L. (2024). The synthesis, characteristics, and application of hierarchical porous materials in carbon dioxide reduction reactions. Catalysts, 14(12), 936.

Abbassi, A., Moghaddam, M., & Ghazanfarian, J. (2022). Microstructure effects on performance and deactivation of hierarchically structured porous catalyst: A pore network model. SSRN Electronic Journal.

Bhalani, D. V., & Lim, B. (2024). Hydrogen separation membranes: A material perspective. Molecules, 29(19), 4676.

Zhang, Z., Zhou, W., Wang, T., Gu, Z., Zhu, Y., Liu, Z., Wu, Z., Zhang, G., & Jin, W. (2023). Ion–conducting ceramic membrane reactors for the conversion of chemicals. Membranes, 13(7), 621.

Gu, Y. Q., Jin, Z., Zhang, H., Xu, R. J., Zheng, M. J., Guo, Y. M., Song, Q. S., & Jia, C. J. (2015). Transition metal nanoparticles dispersed in an alumina matrix as active and stable catalysts for COx-free hydrogen production from ammonia. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 3(33), 17172–17180.

Sabouri, R., Ladewig, B. P., & Prasetya, N. (2025). Mixed matrix membranes for hydrogen separation: A comprehensive review and performance analysis. Journal of Materials Chemistry A.

Król, A., Gajec, M., Holewa-Rataj, J., Kukulska-Zając, E., & Rataj, M. (2024). Hydrogen purification technologies in the context of its utilization. Energies, 17(15), 3794.

Biron, D. D. S., Poletto, P., Duarte, J., Zeni, M., Bergmann, C. P., & Santos, V. D. (2015). Preparation and characterization of PA66/alumina composite membrane. Materials Research, 18(4), 748–755.

Biron, D. D. S., Poletto, P., Duarte, J., Zeni, M., Bergmann, C. P., & Santos, V. D. (2021). Preparation and characterization of PA66/alumina composite membrane. In Ciência e Engenharia de Materiais: Conceitos, Fundamentos e Aplicação (Vol. 1, pp. 338–354). Editora Científica Digital.

Ha, J. H., Abbas Bukhari, S. Z., Lee, J., & Song, I. H. (2016). Preparation and characterisation of alumina-based composite support layers. Advances in Applied Ceramics, 115(4), 229–235.

Li, T., Rabuni, M. F., Hartley, U. W., & Li, K. (2022). Advanced ceramic membrane design for gas separation and energy application. In 60 Years of the Loeb-Sourirajan Membrane (pp. 239–268). Elsevier.

Bhandari, A. R., Flemings, P. B., Ramiro-Ramirez, S., Hofmann, R., & Polito, P. J. (2019). Gas and liquid permeability measurements in Wolfcamp samples. Fuel, 236, 1026–1036.

Zrelli, A., Bessadok, A., & Alsalhy, Q. (2022). Important parameters of ceramic membranes derived from oasis waste and its application for car wash wastewater treatment. Journal of Membrane Science and Research, 8(1), e247250.

Wang, F., Lee, J., Ha, J. H., & Song, I. H. (2017). Surface modification of alumina membranes via a sol-gel process for antifouling properties. Materials Letters, 191, 200–202.

Hashemi, T., Mehrnia, M. R., & Ghezelgheshlaghi, S. (2022). Influence of alumina nanoparticles on the performance of polyacrylonitrile membranes in MBR. Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering, 20(1), 375–384.

Kageyama, H., Hayashi, K., Maeda, K., Attfield, J. P., Hiroi, Z., Rondinelli, J. M., & Poeppelmeier, K. R. (2018). Expanding frontiers in materials chemistry and physics with multiple anions. Nature Communications, 9(1), 772.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-21

How to Cite

M. Ramalan, M., Hashim, I., Dauda, M., & Tonye, I. (2026). Knudsen Number Sensitivity to Pressure Drop in Composite Ceramic Membranes. Journal of Applied Membrane Science & Technology, 30(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.11113/jamst.v30n1.335

Issue

Section

Articles