A Review of Synthetic Polymers in Hemodialysis Membranes: Impact on Biocompatibility and Performance

Authors

  • Masooma Irfan Interdisciplinary Research Centre in Biomedical Materials, COMSATS University Islamabad (CUI), Lahore Campus, Defence Road, Off Raiwind Road, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Tahira Nasir Department of Chemistry, COMSATS University Islamabad (CUI), Lahore Campus, Defence Road, Off Raiwind Road, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Usman Haider Department of Chemistry, COMSATS University Islamabad (CUI), Lahore Campus, Defence Road, Off Raiwind Road, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Irfan Interdisciplinary Research Centre in Biomedical Materials, COMSATS University Islamabad (CUI), Lahore Campus, Defence Road, Off Raiwind Road, Lahore, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jamst.v29n2.316

Keywords:

Hemodialysis, synthetic polymers, biocompatibility

Abstract

A wide range of synthetic polymers is employed in hemodialysis (HD) applications, each offering unique advantages and potential limitations that can impact patient outcomes. These polymers are primarily chosen for their excellent permeability to uremic solutes and superior biocompatibility, which are critical for efficient blood purification. However, challenges such as membrane fouling, protein adsorption and long-term blood compatibility remain concerns that can affect the overall efficacy and safety of the treatment. In recent years, advances in polymer engineering have led to the development of new membrane materials with improved selectivity, durability, and reduced inflammatory response. Polysulfone (PS), polyurethane (PU), polyethersulfone (PES) and polyacrylonitrile (PAN) are among the most widely used polymers in commercial dialyzers, each with specific performance characteristics tailored to patient needs. In the current review, we overviewed various types of polymers used as hemodialyzer material and their contribution to enhance patient life span.

References

Deng, L., et al. (2025). Global, regional, and national burden of chronic kidney disease and its underlying etiologies from 1990 to 2021: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. BMC Public Health, 25(1), 636.

Zaman, S. U., et al. (2022). Recent advancement challenges with synthesis of biocompatible hemodialysis membranes. Chemosphere, 307, 135626.

Imperiali, P., et al. (2022). Possible effect of dialysis membrane in polymethylmethacrylate on clinical variables associated with atherosclerosis development in chronic renal failure patients. Archives of Renal Diseases and Management, 7(1), 001–005.

Dong-Ling, X., et al. (2023). Preparation of a low-protein-fouling and high-protein-retention membrane via novel pre-hydrolysis treatment of polyacrylonitrile (PAN). Membranes, 13, 310.

Fu-Qiang, N., et al. (2003). Acrylonitrile-based copolymer membranes containing reactive groups: Surface modification by the immobilization of poly(ethylene glycol) for improving antifouling property and biocompatibility. Langmuir, 19, 9889–9895.

Xuemin, Y., et al. (2015). Surface PEGylation on PLA membranes via micro-swelling and crosslinking for improved biocompatibility/hemocompatibility. RSC Advances, 5, 107949–107956.

Zhu, L.-J., et al. (2015). Surface zwitterionization of hemocompatible poly(lactic acid) membranes for hemodiafiltration. Journal of Membrane Science, 475, 469–479.

Irfan, M., et al. (2024). Polyurethane/N-3-(triethoxysilyl) propylamine grafted MCM41 membranes: Hemocompatibility and dialysis evaluations. Emergent Materials, 1–15.

Yunren, Q. and W. Can, Sulfonated dihydroxypropyl chitosan modified polyurethane (SDHPCS-PU) hemodialysis membrane and preparation method thereof. 2019.

Zehua, Y., et al. (2015). Hemocompatible polyethersulfone/polyurethane composite membrane for high-performance antifouling and antithrombotic dialyzer. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B, 103, 97–105.

Meyer, J. M., et al. (2021). Safety of a novel dialyzer containing a fluorinated polyurethane surface-modifying macromolecule in patients with end-stage kidney disease. Blood Purification, 50(6), 959–967.

Rossana, F., et al. (2023). Enhancing immune protection in hemodialysis patients: Role of the polymethyl methacrylate membrane. Blood Purification, 52, 11–23.

Vincenzo, C., et al. (2022). REN5: Polymethylmethacrylate membrane reduces serum levels of soluble CD40-ligand, an independent predictor of cardiovascular events in chronic hemodialysis patients. ASAIO Journal, 68, 90.

Duranti, Diletta & Imperiali, Patrizio & Ralli, Chiara & Logias, Franco & Selvi, Antonio & Duranti, Ennio. (2022). Possible effect of dialysis membrane in polymethylmethacrylate on clinical variables associated with atherosclerosis development in chronic renal failure patients. Archives of Renal Diseases and Management, 7, 001–005.

Franzin, R., et al. (2023). Enhancing immune protection in hemodialysis patients: Role of the polymethyl methacrylate membrane. Blood Purification, 52(Suppl. 1), 49–61.

Irfan, M., et al. (2019). Fabrication and performance evaluation of blood compatible hemodialysis membrane using carboxylic multiwall carbon nanotubes and low molecular weight polyvinylpyrrolidone based nanocomposites. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 107(3), 513–525.

Roy, A., & De, S. (2017). State-of-the-art materials and spinning technology for hemodialyzer membranes. Separation & Purification Reviews, 46(3), 216–240.

Anubhab, P., et al. (2023). Enhancing the hemocompatibility of polyethersulfone (PES) hemodialysis membranes using synthesized pseudo zwittronic polymers with various orientations. Results in Surfaces and Interfaces.

Irfan, M., et al. (2019). Hemodialysis performance and anticoagulant activities of PVP-k25 and carboxylic-multiwall nanotube composite blended polyethersulfone membrane. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 103, 109769.

Patra, A., et al. (2023). Enhancing the hemocompatibility of polyethersulfone (PES) hemodialysis membranes using synthesized pseudo zwittronic polymers with various orientations. Results in Surfaces and Interfaces, 13, 100159.

Wolfgang, A., et al. (1997). Polyacrylonitrile membrane, especially capillary or base membrane.

Nur Syazana, R., et al. (2018). Surface-treated and fibrin-coated electrospun polyacrylonitrile fiber for endothelial cell growth and proliferation. Facta Universitatis, Series: Mechanical Engineering, 16, 307–319.

Xiuzhen, W., et al. (2016). Hemocompatibility and ultrafiltration performance of PAN membranes surface‐modified by hyperbranched polyesters. Polymers for Advanced Technologies, 27, 1569–1576.

Xu, D., et al. (2023). Preparation of a low-protein-fouling and high-protein-retention membrane via novel pre-hydrolysis treatment of polyacrylonitrile (PAN). Membranes, 13(3), 310.

Zonghua, L., et al. (2007). Surface modification of poly(L‐lactic acid) by entrapment of chitosan and its derivatives to promote osteoblasts‐like compatibility. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 83, 1110–1116.

Gibson, S. N., et al. (2013). Bioactive albumin functionalized polylactic acid membranes for improved biocompatibility. Reactive & Functional Polymers, 73, 1399–1404.

Liu, Z., et al. (2007). Surface modification of poly(L‐lactic acid) by entrapment of chitosan and its derivatives to promote osteoblasts‐like compatibility. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 83(4), 1110–1116.

Qinglei, Z., et al. (2016). Research on polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) hollow-fiber hemodialyzer. Biomedizinische Technik, 61, 309–316.

Qinglei, Z., et al. (2016). Flux and passage enhancement in hemodialysis by incorporating compound additive into PVDF polymer matrix. Membranes, 6, 45.

Qinglei, Z., et al. (2015). Preparation and preliminary dialysis performance research of polyvinylidene fluoride hollow fiber membranes. Desalination, 5, 120–135.

Zihan, A., et al. (2018). Polydopamine/cysteine surface modified hemocompatible poly(vinylidene fluoride) hollow fiber membranes for hemodialysis. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B, 106, 2869–2877.

Qinglei, Z., et al. (2017). Preparation of anticoagulant polyvinylidene fluoride hollow fiber hemodialysis membranes. Biomedizinische Technik, 62, 57–65.

Darie-Niță, R. N., Râpă, M., & Frąckowiak, S. (2022). Special features of polyester-based materials for medical applications. Polymers, 14(5), 951.

Yoshiaki, T., Toshihidei, N., & Rikio, Y. (2011). Biocompatibility of the dialysis membrane. In Contributions to Nephrology (pp. 139–145). Karger.

Günter, S., et al. (2008). Clinical evaluation of a new dialyzer, FLX-12 GW, with a polyester-polymer alloy membrane. Artificial Organs, 17, 339–345.

Maduell, F., et al. (2024). Most recently developed polyester polymer alloy dialyzer: A new medium cut‐off membrane? Artificial Organs, 48(7), 753–762.

Abe, M., et al. (2011). Characterization of insulin adsorption behavior of dialyzer membranes used in hemodialysis. Artificial Organs, 35(4), 398–403.

Ledebo, M. T. K. M. I. (2011). AN69: Evolution of the world’s first high permeability membrane. In High-performance membrane dialyzers (Vol. 173, pp. 119–129).

Song, H., et al. (2014). Hemocompatibility and ultrafiltration performance of surface-functionalized polyethersulfone membrane by blending comb-like amphiphilic block copolymer. Journal of Membrane Science, 471, 319–327.

Bowry, S. K., Gatti, E., & Vienken, J. (2011). Contribution of polysulfone membranes to the success of convective dialysis therapies. Contributions to Nephrology, 173, 110–118.

Kahraman, Ö. Ş., et al. (2022). Preparation of modified polyethersulfone membranes for hemodialysis. Bulgarian Chemical Communications, 54(3).

An, Z., et al. (2018). Polydopamine/cysteine surface modified hemocompatible poly(vinylidene fluoride) hollow fiber membranes for hemodialysis. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials, 106(8), 2869–2877.

Yamashita, A. C., et al. (2004). Blood compatibility and filtration: Characteristics of newly developed polyester polymer alloy membrane. Hemodialysis International, 8(1), 99–100.

Meyer, J. M., et al. (2020). Performance of a novel dialyzer containing a fluorinated polyurethane surface-modifying macromolecule in patients with end-stage kidney disease. PREPRINT (Version 1) available at Research Square [https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-25165/v1].

Torii, Y., et al. (2023). Polymethylmethacrylate membrane dialyzer: Historic but modern. Blood Purification, 52(Suppl. 1), 8–14.

Zhong, D., et al. (2021). Additive-free preparation of hemodialysis membranes from block copolymers of polysulfone and polyethylene glycol. Journal of Membrane Science, 618, 118690.

Hasheminasab, S., Barzin, J., & Dehghan, R. (2020). High-performance hemodialysis membrane: Influence of polyethylene glycol and polyvinylpyrrolidone in the polyethersulfone membrane. Journal of Membrane Science and Research, 6(4), 438–448.

Vatanpour, V., et al. (2023). Polyacrylonitrile in the preparation of separation membranes: A review. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 62(17), 6537–6558.

Singhvi, M. S., Zinjarde, S. S., & Gokhale, D. V. (2019). Polylactic acid: Synthesis and biomedical applications. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 127(6), 1612–1626.

Yamashita, A. C., & Sakurai, K. (2015). Dialysis membranes—Physicochemical structures. In Updates in Hemodialysis (p. 163).

Downloads

Published

2025-08-01

How to Cite

Irfan, M., Nasir, T., Haider, U., & Irfan, M. (2025). A Review of Synthetic Polymers in Hemodialysis Membranes: Impact on Biocompatibility and Performance. Journal of Applied Membrane Science & Technology, 29(2), 157–168. https://doi.org/10.11113/jamst.v29n2.316

Issue

Section

Articles