Development of Zeolitic Imidazolate Framework-8/Polydimethylsiloxane Membrane with Primitive Structure for Carbon Dioxide Permeation Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/jamst.v30n2.346Keywords:
ZIF-8 nanoparticles, ZIF-8/PDMS membrane, TPMS, Primitive structure, CO2 gas permeation, Additive manufacturingAbstract
Membrane technology plays a vital role in carbon dioxide (CO2) removal as one of the key actions to mitigate climate change. Additive manufacturing has emerged as an alternative method for membrane fabrication due to its high flexibility. Triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS) architectures are widely recognized for their high mechanical robustness and distinctive properties with continuous smooth geometry and zero mean curvature. These features facilitate seamless fluid flow across the structure, and thus, minimizing stagnant regions and reducing the risk of contamination. Among the TPMS structures, the primitive structure is notable for its high compressive strength and mechanical resistance. This study aims to fabricate and evaluate a primitive-structured zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 (ZIF-8)/polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) mixed-matrix membrane with 2 × 1 × 1 cubic unit cell for carbon dioxide permeation using a sacrificial mold fabrication approach. The membrane was fabricated using a sacrificial mold printed via fused deposition modeling. The ZIF-8 fillers and membranes were characterized using field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). The primitive-structured ZIF-8/PDMS membrane demonstrated CO2 permeability and CO2/N2 ideal selectivity that are comparable to reported literature values, reaching 13.17 ± 0.57 × 10³ Barrer and 7.76 ± 0.28, respectively, at 0.025 bar. This suggests that removing the sacrificial mold through dissolution is unlikely to compromise the membrane surface, and therefore, represents a viable approach for the fabrication of membranes with complicated structures.
References
[1] Guan, W., Dai, Y., Dong, C., Yang, X., & Xi, Y. (2020). Zeolite imidazolate framework (ZIF)-based mixed matrix membranes for CO2 separation: A review. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 137, 48968.
[2] Ti, W., Ng, D. K., Ng, L. Y., & Andiappan, V. (2022). Optimal blue hydrogen process with CO2 capture, utilisation and storage. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 94, 211–216.
[3] Rangaraj, V. M., Wahab, M. A., Reddy, K. S. K., Kakosimos, G., Abdalla, O., Favvas, E. P., et al. (2020). Metal organic framework-based mixed matrix membranes for carbon dioxide separation: Recent advances and future directions. Frontiers in Chemistry, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2020.00534
[4] Lei, L., Bai, L., Lindbråthen, A., Pan, F., Zhang, X., & He, X. (2020). Carbon membranes for CO2 removal: Status and perspectives from materials to processes. Chemical Engineering Journal, 401, 126084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.126084
[5] Kamble, A. R., Patel, C. M., & Murthy, Z. V. P. (2021). A review on the recent advances in mixed matrix membranes for gas separation processes. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 145, 111062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111062
[6] Katare, A., Kumar, S., Kundu, S., Sharma, S., Kundu, L. M., & Mandal, B. (2023). Mixed matrix membranes for carbon capture and sequestration: Challenges and scope. ACS Omega, 8, 17511–17522. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c00976
[7] Nguyen, T.-M. T., Chen, J.-W., Pham, M.-T., Bui, H. M., Hu, C.-C., You, S.-J., et al. (2023). A high-performance ZIF-8 membrane for gas separation applications: Synthesis and characterization. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 31, 103169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2023.103169
[8] Ashtiani, S., Sofer, Z., Průša, F., & Friess, K. (2021). Molecular-level fabrication of highly selective composite ZIF-8-CNT-PDMS membranes for effective CO2/N2, CO2/H2 and olefin/paraffin separations. Separation and Purification Technology, 274, 119003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2021.119003
[9] Cao, Q., Ding, X., Zhao, H., Zhang, L., Xin, Q., & Zhang, Y. (2021). Improving gas permeation performance of PDMS by incorporating hollow polyimide nanoparticles with microporous shells and preparing defect-free composite membranes for gas separation. Journal of Membrane Science, 635, 119508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2021.119508
[10] Taherizadeh, A., Simon, A., Richter, H., Stelter, M., & Voigt, I. (2024). Development and investigation of a multilayer PDMS/zeolite composite membrane for CO2 separation applications. Separation and Purification Technology, 346, 127344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2024.127344
[11] Wang, H., Ni, Y., Dong, Z., & Zhao, Q. (2021). A mechanically enhanced metal-organic framework/PDMS membrane for CO2/N2 separation. Reactive and Functional Polymers, 160, 104825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2021.104825
[12] Fu, W., Zhang, L., Liu, J., Yang, T., Sun, M., Ma, X., et al. (2025). Ceramic-based composite membranes decorated by incorporating ZIF-8 and PDMS for highly efficient CO2/N2 separation. Separation and Purification Technology, 352, 128142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2024.128142
[13] Gutierrez, D. B., Caldona, E. B., Yang, Z., Suo, X., Cheng, X., Dai, S., et al. (2022). 3D-printed PDMS-based membranes for CO2 separation applications. MRS Communications, 12, 1174–1182. https://doi.org/10.1557/s43579-022-00285-0
[14] Thomas, N., Sreedhar, N., Al-Ketan, O., Rowshan, R., Abu Al-Rub, R. K., & Arafat, H. (2019). 3D printed spacers based on TPMS architectures for scaling control in membrane distillation. Journal of Membrane Science, 581, 38–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2019.03.059
[15] Novak, N., Al-Ketan, O., Krstulović-Opara, L., Rowshan, R., Abu Al-Rub, R. K., Vesenjak, M., et al. (2021). Quasi-static and dynamic compressive behaviour of sheet TPMS cellular structures. Composite Structures, 266, 113801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113801
[16] Femmer, T., Kuehne, A. J. C., & Wessling, M. (2014). Print your own membrane: Direct rapid prototyping of polydimethylsiloxane. Lab on a Chip, 14, 2610–2613. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4LC00471B
[17] Femmer, T., Kuehne, A. J. C., Torres-Rendon, J., Walther, A., & Wessling, M. (2015). Print your membrane: Rapid prototyping of complex 3D-PDMS membranes via a sacrificial resist. Journal of Membrane Science, 478, 12–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2014.12.038
[18] Md. Nordin, N. A. H., Ismail, A. F., Mustafa, A., Murali, R. S., & Matsuura, T. (2015). Utilizing low ZIF-8 loading for an asymmetric PSf/ZIF-8 mixed matrix membrane for CO2/CH4 separation. RSC Advances, 5, 30206–30215. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA01856B
[19] Zhang, H., Zhao, M., Yang, Y., & Lin, Y. S. (2019). Hydrolysis and condensation of ZIF-8 in water. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 288, 109568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2019.109568
[20] Liu, J., He, J., Wang, L., Li, R., Chen, P., Rao, X., et al. (2016). NiO-PTA supported on ZIF-8 as a highly effective catalyst for hydrocracking of Jatropha oil. Scientific Reports, 6, 23667. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep23667
[21] Bourassi, M., Pasichnyk, M., Oesch, O., Sundararajan, S., Trávničková, T., Soukup, K., et al. (2021). Glycidyl and methyl methacrylate UV-grafted PDMS membrane modification toward tramadol membrane selectivity. Membranes, 11, 752. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11100752
[22] Du, P. D., Hieu, N. T., & Thien, T. V. (2021). Ultrasound-assisted rapid ZIF-8 synthesis, porous ZnO preparation by heating ZIF-8, and their photocatalytic activity. Journal of Nanomaterials, 2021, 9988998. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9988998
[23] Pan, Y., Xie, R., Xu, B., & Chen, C. (2021). Determination of sorption and diffusion for ethanol through superhydrophobic ZIF/PDMS mixed matrix membrane. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 320, 111086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2021.111086
[24] Mohammadi, A., & Nakhaei Pour, A. (2023). Triethylenetetramine-impregnated ZIF-8 nanoparticles for CO2 adsorption. Journal of CO2 Utilization, 69, 102424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2023.102424
[25] Klonos, P. A. (2018). Crystallization, glass transition, and molecular dynamics in PDMS of low molecular weights: A calorimetric and dielectric study. Polymer, 159, 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2018.10.069
[26] TA Instruments. (2023). Interpreting DSC curves: Part 1—Dynamic measurements. https://www.tainstruments.com/
[27] Fang, M., Wu, C., Yang, Z., Wang, T., Xia, Y., & Li, J. (2015). ZIF-8/PDMS mixed matrix membranes for propane/nitrogen mixture separation: Experimental result and permeation model validation. Journal of Membrane Science, 474, 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2014.09.050
[28] Li, S., Li, Z., & Dong, Q. (2016). Diffusion coefficients of supercritical CO2 in oil-saturated cores under low permeability reservoir conditions. Journal of CO2 Utilization, 14, 47–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2016.03.002
[29] Zainuddin, M. I. F., Ahmad, A. L., & Shah Buddin, M. M. H. (2023). Polydimethylsiloxane/magnesium oxide nanosheet mixed matrix membrane for CO2 separation application. Membranes, 13, 337. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes13030337
[30] Robeson, L. M. (2008). The upper bound revisited. Journal of Membrane Science, 320, 390–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2008.04.030
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright of articles that appear in Journal of Applied Membrane Science & Technology belongs exclusively to Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Penerbit UTM Press). This copyright covers the rights to reproduce the article, including reprints, electronic reproductions, or any other reproductions of similar nature.













